Skip to content
Home
About Bacon & Thomas
Claim Construction
Federal Court Decisions
Licensing
News
Obviousness
Patents
Preamble
Trademarks
Archive for March, 2011
THAT WAS UNEXPECTEDLY…WELL…EXPECTED on
March 21st, 2011
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Issues Supplementary Examination Guidelines on “Definiteness” and Related Issues on
March 15th, 2011
Bacon & Thomas Office in Alexandria Virginia.
Visit our firm's web site at
www.baconthomas.com
.
Recent Articles
NON-ANALOGOUS ART DOESN’T HOLD WATER!
Written Description and Antibody Claims; Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc. v. Abbot Laboratories
THAT WAS UNEXPECTEDLY…WELL…EXPECTED
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Issues Supplementary Examination Guidelines on “Definiteness” and Related Issues
Patent Eligibility of Medical Diagnostics Claims Reaffirmed
OBJECTIVELY SPEAKING – OBVIOUSNESS REQUIRES OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE
When is a Process Claim Directed to an Unpatentable “Abstract Idea” Under 35 U.S.C. § 101?
Broadest Possible Interpretation Versus Broadest Reasonable Interpretation
Excuse Me, You’re Missing a Necessary Party to this Suit! A123 Systems, Inc. v. Hydro-Quebec
Experimental Use Versus Commerical Use: In re Ceccarelli
Categories
Claim Construction
Federal Court Decisions
Licensing
News
Obviousness
Patents
Preamble
Trademarks
Archives
June 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010